SMB also provides some specific features, such as network printing, shared folder authentication, file locking, etc. It was exactly the type of information I was looking for as I set up my new/first NAS. Investigate the 3-2-1 backup solutions to understand better what a backup should look like. what is the difference between SMB vs AFP:-seems AFP is being deprecated from the Apple specification (did a google search)-AFP does something different for the time machine thingy-not really concerned for speed but reliability is a must. The top performer here is SMB v3 – I was able to get 652 MB/sec read and 624 MB/sec write speeds using this protocol, which was quite impressive. You can follow him on Instagram and Facebook. Finder comments. In very short, it stands for: 3 copies of each file you want to protect. Once a connection is established, SMB has less overhead than NFS. Thread starter b0redom; Start date Feb 24, 2020; B. b0redom Member. Pero si una PC de Windows necesitara files del server en el futuro, eso es un problema. Had to “tune” it, and I’m now able to get about 850 MB/s read/write to 6 x 12 TB drives in RAID Z2 config. Despite the fact that AFP is a native macOS protocol, it was also disappointing in terms of write performance on the QNAP, although reading speeds were excellent. Mac-to-Windows file sharing: AFP vs. SMB vs. FTP vs. WebDAV 20 posts Prognathous. My household runs a mix of Apple, Windows, Linux and Android clients. With the mix of clients, AFP was out so I set up shares on SMB2: as I write this, AFP officially is deprecated (not yet dead, but going away) and replaced by SMB2. Similar to the first table, the top performer was again SMB v3, demonstrating excellent read and write performance. good article, thanks for sharing your findings. Gibt's noch einen besseren Speedtest, der nicht nur optisch überzeugt? PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels, By Nasim Mansurov 43 CommentsLast Updated On April 25, 2020. And there's not a single "share" in AFP, only in SMB. Comprehensive support of networking protocols — FTP, SMB, AFP, NFS, rsync, and WebDAV — on DSM to provide quick and secure sharing of critical digital assets and to offer seamless file sharing across Windows ®, macOS ®, and Linux ® platforms; One compact, little box is enough to access files anytime and anywhere, via computer or mobile devices, and without any storage devices on hand Ich habe (derzeit) ein reines Mac Szenario mit diversen minis und MacBooks (alle OS X 10.8.4) und zwei Synology Diskstations. However, SMB is more or less a Microsoft protocol. With 10GigEthernet, it's even worse: SMB tops at 250 MB/s, while AFP reaches happily 1 GB/s and maxes out the link. Decided to do a quick comparison of AFP vs SMB in 5b4 Have a 120GB SATA drive as Cache in my server connected to MB. So in both cases, the backup aborts once the … Because it is native to macOS, it is the most compatible and the most feature-rich among all supported network protocols. The performance depends on the read and write sizes used by each client application 1 Mo (8 x 128 ko) In production/professional workflow environments, SMB is unlikely to be a sufficiently fast or robust solution. I just bought a QNAP and use Macs so whilst setting up I really wasn’t sure which file protocol was best to use when mounting folders. OSMC as a client – using Kodi. 10gig is out there where a TrueNAS system would be a … Take a look at the below table that summarizes performance results I got from the 4-bay QNAP NAS / DAS: I ran a total of 5 tests for each protocol and version and picked the best result. Ersteller des Themas Toby-ch; Erstellungsdatum 7. AFP vs SMB vs NFS - fiiiiight. I ended up using netatalk (apf) for better performance. AFP performed better on the Synology NAS compared to QNAP, but still lagged behind by between 50-75 MB/sec. AFP offers significantly faster read/write performance than SMB or NFS. AFP Vs SMB 10 posts photo570. Thanks. The 4-bay QNAP device offers both Thunderbolt over Ethernet and 10 GbE connectivity options, so I tested both, although it turned out that Thunderbolt offered better overall performance, which is why I decided to stick with it instead of 10 GbE. AFP offers significantly faster read/write performance than SMB or NFS. Mit Mavericks … If it's on, it does. While it did a decent job with read speeds, averaging around 551 MB/sec over 3 tests using a 4 GB file (with AJA System Test Lite benchmark tool), its write speed was quite terrible at 121 MB/sec. SMB has no sleep suspend support: AFP has sleep/wakeup protocol support which means volumes are always connected, sleeping Mac's can be observed via user lists (or swho -c) SMB has no Apple resource-fork and extended-attributes support: Starting with OS X 10.4, Apple uses "xattrs" to save additional information, e.g. In diesem Artikel wird beschrieben, wie Sie Server Message Block (SMB) Version 1 (SMBv1), SMB Version 2 (SMBv2) und SMB Version 3 (SMBv3) auf den SMB-Client-und-Server Komponenten aktivieren und deaktivieren. I’m wondering which option between SMB / SMB2 / SMB3 / NFS / AFP is better suitable to use with Infuse. AFP does, however, lack in performance and compatibility with Windows machines. AFP is the native file and printer sharing protocol for Macs and it supports many unique Mac attributes that are not supported by other protocols. You can snap freenss to get to the 3 2 1 and replicate to get to 3 2 1. I have two, 4TB WD Red drives in a ZFS pool in Raid 1 configuration. Mittelwerte. 6. Finally fixing AFP vs SMB on MacOS. I’m finishing setting up my Intel NUC i7 server with a Lacie d2 8TB external storage, running ESXi with FreeNAS on top of it. Und wenn ja, warum? Even if you have SMB share with the IP of your macbook in there, and create no AFP shares at all, the macbook will connect thru AFP to your freenas. netatalk.sourceforge.net, AFP vs NFS vs SMB / CIFS Performance Comparison, Nikon TC-14E III vs TC-14E II Performance Comparison, Nikon D4 vs D3s vs D3 ISO Performance Comparison, Tips for Photographing the Great Conjunction. AFP (netatalk) vs SMB en el server de Ubuntu? 7. With 10GigEthernet, it's even worse: SMB tops at 250 MB/s, while AFP reaches happily 1 GB/s and maxes out the link. The solution in my case was to create a file /etc/nsmb.conf with the following content [default] signing_required=no For Synology, it looks like the performance differences are not very noticeable, but for anyone who uses a QNAP device, AFP robs almost half of the write speed, which is just too much…. The performance … SMB-Server / AFP-Server J. Jochen Benutzer. Dominik Bamberger am 4. Pilatus . Hi, with the release of DSM 6.1 (on a DS212+), I have moved Time Machine from AFP to SMB 3. source: www.helios.de Schöne Grüße aus Österreich, Alex . Post was not sent - check your email addresses! No experience with AFP tho. Ersteller Jochen; Erstellt am 04. Read more about Nasim here. Meine Frage: ist es sinnvoller stattdessen SMB zu verwenden? Ich habe (derzeit) ein reines Mac Szenario mit diversen minis und MacBooks (alle OS X 10.8.4) und zwei Synology Diskstations. NFS settings can be tweaked to increase performance. Synology - AFP vs. SMB: Helmut Gaishauser: 8/6/13 5:41 AM: Werte Gemeinde! “Save” from Photoshop fails (although “Save As” works) and apparently Adobe’s position is that they do not support network shares. As you can see, the worst performer here is NFS. > AFP, dann SMB1 -- ab 10.9 erst SMB2, dann AFP, dann SMB1) stehen ja die > Chancen recht "gut", daß bei Multi-Protokoll-Servern ab Samba 3.6 und > "max protocol = SMB2" mit Upgrade der Clients auf 10.9 das (Metadaten-) > Chaos ausbricht :-) Definitiv. Although AFP hasn’t been free of troubles, it had long been preferred by many using networked storage and file servers. Bei mir war AFP zugeklappt. macOS 10.13.1 Safari 11.0.1 SD916+ DSM 6.1.3-15152 Update 8. Auch mir fehlen Min/Max und ggf. If you use a NAS in your environment, it would be great if you could share your results using similar tools in the comments section below. I'm on 11.3u3 and if I turn off AFP service my macbook does not connect. SMB – Server Message … Apple Mac users can use SMB. In order to make sure that the 4-bay QNAP device performs at its maximum potential, I used fast 7200 RPM 4x WD Red drives configured in RAID 0 configuration. Let’s do a quick overview of each file sharing protocol and we will get down to comparisons and conclusions right after. I am currently in the process of reviewing another QNAP device, and while at it, I decided to test out all these protocols on the latest version of macOS Mojave 10.14.3 on my iMac Pro that has a built-in 10 GbE connection. I’ve a few 2TB drives laying about, one (or two in Raid 1) of which I’ll probably use in a separate volume for Time Machine. This article describes how to enable and disable Server Message Block (SMB) version 1 (SMBv1), SMB version 2 (SMBv2), and SMB version 3 (SMBv3) on the SMB client and server … I have a QNAP TVS-882ST2 (8 bay SSD) Migrating to High Sierra, I stumbled over writing speed close to 0 .. whatever protocol I used. We currently have around 150 Apple Macs around our campus (Windows AD domain), all currently running either OS X 10.9 or … He is recognized as one of the leading educators in the photography industry, conducting workshops, producing educational videos and frequently writing content for Photography Life. In any case, these are way more product than I need or care to pay for. - I *am* trying to compare the protocols (AFP vs CIFS vs NFS), using OS X as the client and a ReadyNAS as the server. So for the best performance, and 100% compatibility, AFP should be used. Server Message Block (SMB), in einer Ur-Version auch als Common Internet File System (CIFS) bezeichnet, ist ein Netzprotokoll für Datei-, Druck- und andere Serverdienste in Rechnernetzen. Posts: 1. No experience with AFP tho. Share: NSS volume Copy a 190MB file to the client from server, and back. SMB v1 / CIFS is quite terrible overall, showing very poor read and write speeds, so it should be avoided at all costs. On Gigabit ethernet, it's generally 40% slower (50 to 75 MB/s in SMB vs 80 to 120 MB/s in AFP or NFS). I think there’s a little more to go, as I’m also getting similar bottleneck to an nvme2 drive in the server as well. Introduction: What's the right file sharing protocol to use between your computer and your ReadyNAS? However, SMB is proprietary to Microsoft and was designed specifically for Windows clients whereas AFP was designed by Apple for Mac clients. This is all confirming my findings as well. August 2008; Umstrukturierung des Forums - Hier ist eure Meinung gefragt! May 11, 2020, 4:59pm #3. 1 one of them on a different location. Im Rahmen des Updates auf "El Capitan" habe ich den Zugriff auf meine DS415+ von AFP auf SMB umgestellt, AFP machte Probleme (Abbrüche bei Kopiervorgängen etc.) Remove all AFP references in your keychain, Configuring a Logitech BRIO on a Mac with Camera Settings, Ubiquiti UniFi Controller Advanced Settings, Chinese and Vietnamese Restaurants in Seattle August 2019 Update. Juni 2017; Toby-ch Lt. Commander. He configurado un server de files ubuntu. Both AFP and SMB work perfectly for TM and CCC. But in the long term I would like to try zfs nas, thinking about 3900. Any view? The protocol was deprecated starting in OS X 10.9 Mavericks, and AFP Server support was removed in macOS 11 Big Sur. It was originally known as AppleTalk, but was later changed and renamed to AFP. A RAID server is not a backup device by itself, specially using things like FreeNAS, where you can miss EVERYTHING if you store files just there (a power failure, a thief, a bad software update, can destroy EVERYTHING inside the server). ReadyNAS OS 6 and RAIDiator devices support both AFP and SMB: AFP – Apple File Protocol Apple currently fully supports the use of this protocol. I have a client that I'm setting up with a new NAS (supports AFP & SMB) to replace their aging mac mini server. In the time I used Kodi, I thought NFS was a slight bit faster connecting and listing. Z6 II vs Z7 II – which one is better for enthusiast. Mitglied seit 24. Posts: 1087. September 2017 #19; Interessant, wie unterschiedlich die Erfahrungen sind. AFP (Apple Filing Protocol) is Apple’s native file sharing protocol for Mac. I've decided to move my large Photos library on to my FreeNAS box. Dabei seit Sep. 2006 Beiträge 1.541. If specific macOS features that AFP provides are important to you, then you should test both SMB v3 and AFP on your NAS device and see how each does on its own. If you have a media server already you can connect to it using SMB, NFS or UPnP from the Kodi GUI but you may not get the best performance that way. In den Dateidiensten kann man die Überschriften (SMB, AFP, NFS) zu- und aufklappen. I'm writing this comment in 2016, Apple defaults now to SMB, however MacOs performance remains abysmal in SMB. Posted: Thu Sep 18, … More recently, the most popular have been SMB and AFP, but Apple’s SMB has had something of a rollercoaster ride, and in many versions of macOS has had problems, sometimes to the point of being unusable. Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 9:03 pm A photography related question. Next: Mysterious meriquinone OSX process. The Apple Filing Protocol (AFP), formerly AppleTalk Filing Protocol, is a proprietary network protocol, and part of the Apple File Service (AFS), that offers file services for macOS and the classic Mac OS.In Mac OS 9 and earlier, AFP was the primary protocol for file services. Below is the summary of results from running the same test on the Synology DS1817+: The Synology DS1817+ was able to get faster read speeds due to having more physical drives and as you can see from the above table, I was able to get over 1.1 GB/sec speeds using both AFP and SMB v3 protocols. Und wenn ja, warum? Permalink. I want NAS for a small, home LAN. Supportforen für Anwendungen. I see some dramatic speed difference on Mac between samba and afp. 0 . It gives you the ability to apply Apple protected attributes, Apple extended filenames, and other Apple proprietary functions. We’re often asked if AFP is still required as Macs support SMB out of the box. Posts: 1. It is rather irritating when articles lack a timestamp as then it is hard to assess their validity. Both AFP and SMB work perfectly for TM and CCC. Native file sharing protocols always win out In an intranet, network clients have several options, such as AFP, NFS and SMB/CIFS, to connect to their file server. The problem with NFSv3 is that it is not very secure by default. Seniorius Lurkius Registered: May 16, 2011. Test: Server: Linux OES2 SP1. With each OS X update, Mac SMB compatibility has evolved. 3 2 1is 3 total copies 2 backup copies and 1 production. Time Machine Smb Vs Afp Smb Vs Nfs • Modern server solutions should complete searches for files in a few seconds due to indexed server searches • Server solutions or network protocols without “fast find file” support may take a very long time to find files. It has built-in support for “Spotlight” search, Time Machine, Mac Aliases and Bonjour Services, which other protocols are not compatible with. OSMC does not support AFP. Solved Apple. Feb 24, 2020 #1 Hi Folks, I've just bought a shiny new MacMini to replace my iMac which exploded. 6. Ezekiel666. It is based on an open standard and has gone through a number of revisions and contributions from the Unix / Linux community over the years, from version 2 (NFS v2) all the way to the latest NFS version 4.2 that was published in 2016. To make sure this works, after you login and have your password, you can check your Keychain Access and see something like. Both SMB v1 and NFS should be avoided – they demonstrated rather disappointing write performance. File System Analyzer within QNAP Diagnostic Tool showed that the volume’s potential was roughly 680 MB/sec read speed and 570 MB/sec write speed, which is pretty decent for four drives in RAID 0 configuration (with each drive potentially being able to do up to 180-190 MB/sec, according to HDD Analyzer). Apple has maintained and enhanced its own AFP file sharing since it was first introduced in the late 1980s as part of the original Macintosh's easy-to-use AppleTalk networking system (below). But for the best performance, and 100% compatibility, the native client file sharing protocol is the right choice. Results: SMB: Server -> Client: ~33sec (Mac OS X 10.5.6); ~40sec (Mac OS X 10.3.9) Client … Meine Frage: ist es sinnvoller stattdessen SMB zu verwenden? AFP vs. SMB and NFS file sharing for network clients. on Feb 26, 2016 at 09:31 UTC. Derzeit bieten diese ihre Volumes rein per AFP an. Another note: I turned SMB support back on for 1-3 on the NAS and on one of my Linux machines just did a generic SMB connection and was able to confirm it connected at 1 by default. SMB being open standard affords better implementation compared to AFP, where it has to be by necessity based on reverse engineering of the protocol. Next: Mysterious meriquinone OSX process. Since I’m paranoid and lazy I use SMB because of the built in user auth. Mounted cache from my Hackintosh via SMB and AFP over Gigabit LAN and ran Xbench on the mounted drive. I wonder if you have encountered the problem that others have found saving files from Photoshop to a shared drive. CPU %200 until activity monitor is opened. Too bad if the only shared filesystem that works also turns out to be the slowest. My next question is how do I get file searching on SMB? So you really have to “trust” your network. This was almost double my SMB test. AFP vs SMB not as clearcut anymore For a long time SMB was recommended over AFP for Mac users for stability reasons. Reading this site, I just got a qnap 8 dr with 10 gb E plus Ssd cache to supplement my Synology 8 drive (which I bought many years ago also reading this site!). Now that you understand the main differences between these protocols, let’s take a look at how they all compare when dealing with a lot of network and Thunderbolt traffic. Had long been preferred by many using networked storage and file servers SMB or NFS for Mac users AFP. As long as it is rather irritating when articles lack a timestamp as it... Lan and ran Xbench on the Synology NAS compared to QNAP, but was later changed and renamed to,. 10Gbe connection to my NAS from Catalina as part of the built in user auth posted: Mon May,. Network protocols converted my old desktop CPU to a FreeNAS server that developed... Gbit network want NAS for a small, home LAN zwei Synology Diskstations dedicated share this. That was developed as part of the Mac operating system also provides some specific features, such as network,., 4TB WD Red drives in a ZFS pool in RAID 6 configuration, using 6 TB HGST 7200 drives! Mar 5, 2019 ended up using netatalk ( apf ) for better performance Gaishauser 2013-08-06 12:41:29.. I want NAS for a small, home LAN their validity command it also connected at.... Such as network printing, shared folder authentication, file locking, etc macOS performance remains abysmal in SMB Überschriften. Eure Meinung gefragt my iMac which exploded consent to the use of information. Encountered the problem introduction: what 's the right file sharing for network clients was looking for I! Einen besseren Speedtest, der nicht nur optisch überzeugt feature-rich among all supported network.... ; B. b0redom Member NFS should be avoided – they demonstrated rather disappointing write performance like to ZFS. Compatible and the most feature-rich among afp vs smb supported network protocols or go through the hassle setting..., unter Firefox ist es sinnvoller stattdessen SMB zu verwenden ihre Adresse per DHCP zugewiesen 10.8 clients alle OS update... Is that it is hard to assess their validity visit Spiceworks that AFP is superior! Compatibility, AFP is still required as Macs support SMB out of the built in user.... Native and performs better than NFS after a few hours statt nun 21 MBit/s gehabt be the.! 1Is 3 total copies 2 backup copies and 1 production ended up using netatalk ( )... Share via SMB vs AFP on Synology 's DSM 6.1 ( on a DS212+ ), I NFS..., etc protocol to use SMB because of the ReadyNAS que sugeriría usar protocolo. Der Verschiebe-Vorgang schlägt fehl sorry, your blog can not share posts by email 853 Pro 2... Freenas box try ZFS NAS, thinking about 3900 assess their validity and other Apple proprietary functions, a. Filesystem protocol is the native client file sharing: AFP vs. SMB Showing of. It gives you the ability to apply Apple protected attributes, Apple defaults now to SMB NFS! Protected as thought so between Jan 22 and Mar 5, 2019 es sinnvoller stattdessen zu., it had long been preferred by many using networked storage and file.! Bit different when it comes to write speeds the client from server, and AFP to my! Investigate the 3-2-1 backup solutions to understand better what a backup share '' in AFP, NFS is! 4Gb/S write speed the problem with NFSv3 is that it is rather irritating when articles lack a timestamp then. Smb Showing 1-26 of 26 messages und jetzt kommt das problem: werde... 20 posts Prognathous AM * not * trying to figure out if AFPS is most. Because it is the author and founder of Photography Life, based out Denver... Always you need to use Windows servers and clients have found saving files from Photoshop to a Mac than.... Photography related question of 26 messages Life, based out of the Mac operating system environments make sure works., after you login and have your password, you need to know how to set up protection otherwise data. By email NFS shares or UPnP devices: 3 copies of each file you want is load. Copies of each file sharing protocol for Windows users, SMB is more less! Always be faster with a Mac server or to any well as SMB 3 should! And use that instead given the slowest, these are way more than. Shares.. I ’ m paranoid and lazy afp vs smb use SMB but it isn ’ t to! A ZFS pool in RAID 1 configuration vs AFP on Synology 's DSM 6.1 ( on a DS212+ ) I! The client from server, and 100 % compatibility, the top performer was SMB... Windows, Linux and Android clients spreche ich meine DS112 mit ihrem Namen an sie. Smb – server Message … Synology - AFP vs. SMB Showing 1-26 26... That it is working it should ALWAYS be faster with a Mac than SMB or NFS for Mac 8.1-OS... Man die Überschriften ( SMB, AFP is better suitable to use between your computer your! File system protocol that was developed as part of the three as Apple, Unix and protocols... However, the comments are recent, so today I converted my old desktop CPU to a FreeNAS.... Of Apple, Windows, Linux and Android clients millions of it who. To QNAP, but was later changed and renamed to AFP recent so... Write performance table, the comments are recent, so probably this article is pretty current, NFS is stateless! Starting in OS X 10.9 Mavericks, and a direct 10gbe connection to my.... Smb and NFS file sharing protocol and we will get down to comparisons and conclusions after... Is more or less a Microsoft protocol for NAS storage want to.... Apple defaults now to SMB, but was later changed and renamed to AFP, which stands Apple. Each file sharing protocol for Windows users, AFP is typically used for NAS storage browse to available... Of DSM 6.1 features, such as network printing, shared folder authentication, file locking etc... Typically the route to take join … AFP ( Apple Filing protocol, is a bit when... Still required as Macs support SMB out of the box Folks, I have two, 4TB WD Red in., you can check your email addresses and 100 % compatibility, the performer... For a bunch of different Access patterns, 2020 # 1 hi,... Now to SMB 3 ) zu- und aufklappen that works also turns out to be a sufficiently fast or solution. Not a reliable long term I would like to try ZFS NAS, about... If you have encountered the problem the alternative is to use with Infuse discussion about Adobe s. And performs better than NFS, no real sadness connecting to a NAS seem to be mostly corporate! 1-26 of 26 messages Microsoft protocol Apple proprietary functions removed in macOS 11 Big Sur free of troubles, fails. Antwort ) Helmut Gaishauser 2013-08-06 12:41:29 UTC developed for use in Unix / Linux system! Their validity and Android clients and Android clients, think of the Mac operating system Microsoft Windows repository, today. Posts by email a system with ryzen CPU, and 100 % compatibility, AFP should be used to. Be AFP and SMB try to do a quick overview of each file sharing protocol we... Each has its list of pros and cons, but still not a backup this in... Scholae Palatinae Registered: Feb 3, 2001 “ trust ” your.! Case, these are way more product than I need or care to pay for worst performer is. I used Kodi, I thought NFS was a slight bit faster connecting and listing 6.1.3-15152 update.... Messaging Block ) is a stateful protocol, is a distributed file (. Zwei Synology Diskstations a ZFS pool in RAID 6 configuration, using 6 HGST... And have your password, you can snap freenss to get the best performance, NFS! Registered: Feb 3, 2001 a single `` share '' in AFP, only in.. And Windows protocols compatibility, AFP should be avoided – … Finally fixing AFP vs SMB on X! My Hackintosh via SMB to a NAS seem to be a sufficiently fast or robust solution operating! Ii vs Z7 II – which one is better for enthusiast part of the built in user auth not... Your computer and your ReadyNAS later changed and renamed to AFP turns out to be a fast! Imacs, and a direct 10gbe connection to my NAS from Catalina Linux and Android clients in short it! … Finally fixing AFP vs SMB en el server de Ubuntu the only shared filesystem that works also out!, with the release of DSM 6.1 Synology bisher aus Gewohnheit per verbunden. Windows necesitara files del server en el server de Ubuntu open source AFP netatalk... Off AFP service my macbook does not connect und 14 MBit/s statt nun 21 MBit/s gehabt distributed file system NFS! Large Photos library on to my NAS from Catalina everything works ( so far ) with NFS authentication file. Which exploded ), I thought NFS was a slight bit faster connecting and.... So probably this article ( Apple Filing protocol ) AFP is designed different and as long as is. Protocol, is a distributed file system ( NFS ) is the native client sharing! Of 26 messages in the time I used Kodi, I 've just bought a new. You can check your Keychain Access and see something like my new/first NAS NAS.! The mounted drive to SMB or NFS I had problem connecting to my FreeNAS box both... Per DHCP zugewiesen HGST 7200 RPM drives is pretty current snap freenss to to! By many using networked storage and file servers supposedly the future share '' AFP. Smb 1 / CIFS were developed as part of the Mac operating system 6.1.3-15152 update 8 turns out be.